Tuesday, November 19, 2013

P&P Pt. 1

"You began the evening well, Charlotte," said Mrs. Bennet with civil self-comman to Miss Lucas. "You were Mr. Bingley's first choice." "Yes; but he seemed to like his second better." "Oh! You mean Jane, I suppose, because he danced with her twice. To be sure that did seems as if he admired her - indeed I rather believe he did." 

"The cognitive awards of reading fiction might thus be aligned with the cognitive rewards of pretend play through a shared capacity to stimulate and develop the imagination. It may mean that our enjoyment of fiction is predicated - at least in part - upon our awareness of our 'trying on' mental states potentially available to us but at a given moment differing from our own." 

Pride and Prejudice has an interesting quality of being a fantastic novel while at the same time having characters that irk me beyond explanation. The state of society in the novel is dismal and backwards and it baffles me how it is okay to think so low of oneself just because one does not have a man in their life. I applaud Austen for so easily evoking such emotions in me because I know she in no way was part of that society and I like to think that since the book was so well received by that very same society, that she was poking fun of them without them even realizing. 

In the quote above we can see the lack of class and self-worth in Mrs. Bennet just by looking at the seriousness in which she talks about men. One dance or two and whom he admired the most and most of all of how agreeable he was - just things that are so very important to care about and they form the basis of the objectives that these women have in life.

What Austen's overarching objective was with this novel, however, is not very much related to why people read fiction, the question that Zunshine tries to answer. Nevertheless, it is interesting to read to wrap one's head around why people genuinely enjoy Darcy's story in a day and age where the society portrayed in the book is thankful declining. This quote offers just one explanation.

Monday, November 11, 2013

The Humours | Emotion and Disease


A few links of interest:

Emotion and Disease from the NIH

History of Mind, Medicine, and the Humors: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/emotions/balance.html

PET scanning (from 2011, so a bit outdated):
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/emotions/frontiers.html

The four elements, four qualities, four seasons:
http://wellcomelibrary.org/player/b11594846#0/0/-0.224,-0.0626,1.6351,0.7568


Tuesday, October 29, 2013

What is the difference between boredom and idleness?

Quote 1:Boredom, however, includes as a component the "need for intense mental activity," a need that in the bored person cannot find gratification by generating its own impulse but seeks "incitements" from the outside world as a means of decreasing tension" (Spacks 4).

Quote 2: The Idler, who habituates himself to be satisfied with what he can most easily obtain, not only escapes labours which are often fruitless, but sometimes succeeds better than those who despise all that is within their reach, and think every thing more valuable as it is harder to be acquired”(Idler 1).

             Prior to reading Spacks’ first chapter in Boredom and the excerpt from Johnson’s Idler I assumed that being bored and being idle were similar and rooted within one another: being idle—not doing anything—causing one to be bored. When looking at how the readings for this week framed boredom and idleness, clear differences between the two can be seen. After reading both quotes I got the sense that if someone is idle they are genuinely, perfectly content with their lack of mental stimulation whereas if someone is bored they are longing to be engaged. Also I gathered that idleness is a mental state that is internalized for want of being idle while boredom occurs externally from lack of stimulation from the outside world.

In the first quote on boredom, Spacks states that that boredom requires “intense mental activity” calling it “a need” that must be fulfilled to “decrease tension.” From the urgency of language used, you can feel the sense the intense wanting one who is bored has to regain cognitive activity: it is necessary for said person to become externally engaged in order to maintain a feeling of internal wellbeing. In the second quote Johnson uses words such as “habituates” and “satisfied” to show how being idle is a mental state that the Idler has become accustomed to and has internalized as a guide for subsequent actions (or inaction) that will provide contentment. I found it interesting that Johnson describes the Idler as someone who may actually be out witting the intelligent by just getting by cognitively since their energy does not have to be put forth for tasks that may prove to be menial or unimportant. I could easily see people experiencing boredom as those who may take part in actions they are not passionate about just in order to regain mental stimulus and may ultimately be wasting their time with something that with repetition could make them bored once again.

Monday, October 28, 2013

On Boredom | A Poem by John Berryman

Dream Song 14


Life, friends, is boring. We must not say so.   
After all, the sky flashes, the great sea yearns,   
we ourselves flash and yearn,
and moreover my mother told me as a boy   
(repeatingly) ‘Ever to confess you’re bored   
means you have no

Inner Resources.’ I conclude now I have no   
inner resources, because I am heavy bored.
Peoples bore me,
literature bores me, especially great literature,   
Henry bores me, with his plights & gripes   
as bad as achilles,

who loves people and valiant art, which bores me.   
And the tranquil hills, & gin, look like a drag   
and somehow a dog
has taken itself & its tail considerably away
into mountains or sea or sky, leaving            
behind: me, wag.


Steven Pinker in town Today

A Note from Professor Devin McAuley, Cognitive Science Program 


A reminder that Dr. Steven Pinker will be visiting today, Monday, October 28 as a speaker in the World View Lecture Series at the Wharton Center. 

In addition to his talk at the Wharton Center, there will be a Q&A session with Dr. Pinker from 4:00 - 5:00 pm in Wells Hall room B115. The general topic of the Q&A will be on his book 'How the Mind Works'.  The Q&A session will be open to the public on a first-come, first-served basis, with a room capacity of 600.   

Please distribute this announcement broadly and encourage your students to attend.  

Given the large room size, please let the students in your classes know about this great opportunity.  It would be really super if we can pack the room.

Best,

Devin

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Readings for Next Week

Week 10: Boredom and Interest

TUESDAY
                        *Tristram Shandy,
(focus on sermon scene, “chestnut” scene, and other
descriptions of boredom, interest, or disinterest)
                        Johnson’s Rambler and Idler (on ANGEL)
                        Spacks, Boredom, Intro and Chap. 1
                        *Fielding, Covent Garden Journal
                                    No. 4, A Modern Glossary, 153-157
No. 6, Taste in Books and Reading 167-172               
                       
THURSDAY
                                   
                        Smith, The Wealth of Nations (PE)
                        Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees (PE 242-253)
                       
Bring Johnson’s Rambler & Idler, cont.
*Fielding, Covent Garden Journal, cont.
No. 4, A Modern Glossary, 153-157
No. 6, Taste in Books and Reading (167-172)

                        Optional:  Pope, Essay on Criticism [A])
                                         Addison,  “The Royal Exchange” (PE, 480)

                                         Emmott, see Readings for Week 9

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Updated syllabus online

Hi all—

An updated version of the syllabus is online on ANGEL with the new due dates, including the Metaphors of Mind assignment & the Paper 2 assignment.  Both assignments can be found on ANGEL under "Assignments."

Please note that for next week the neuroscience readings from Stanislas Dehaene's Reading in the Brain are now required, not optional. And the readings for that Thursday are now optional, not required. :)

best,
NP